How the site evaluates workflows and publishes guides
Here is what our examples demonstrate, where their limits are, and how to report a correction before you spend time gathering materials or building.
Workflow fit
Output evidence
Practical usefulness
What gets reviewed before publishing
Workflow pages are checked for clarity around when to use Blueprint mode versus Draw mode, what kind of source material fits the workflow, and what practical output the user gets after using the tool.
Block guides and planning pages are checked for whether they add actual decision value. A collection or guide should not exist only to restate a list of blocks; it should help a builder choose the right set faster.
Comparison pages should explain the test angle, the strengths of each option, and the best-fit use case rather than relying on generic roundup copy.
Checks you can reproduce
In our ten beginner patterns, each preview shows the same grid opened by its editor link. Material counts exclude empty cells. On September 23, 2026, we corrected six lists after comparing all ten templates with their actual block data.
A data check proves grid size and material totals. It does not prove that a build was tested in every game edition, that an export works with every mod, or that a block is available in your world. Guides should state those limits.
Report a correction with the page or pattern name, what you expected, and what happened. For game or export issues, include the edition and version. Substantive article revisions show an updated date separately from the original publication date.